| |
Any
introduction to the broad topic of "film theory and criticism"
must inevitably confront the problem of the written text. At its
very surface, theoretical writing on cinema (or any other art form,
for that matter) can come across as excessively difficult, cryptic
and at times impossible to read and comprehend in any useful way.
Indeed, its very vocabulary, sentence structure and endless references
to obscure scholars and films create a kind of hermetic seal, as
if to deliberately elude our grasp and discourage our attempts to
know.
While
it would require many more than fifteen weeks to examine all the
major theories of cinema, this course is designed to help you to
decode certain fundamental aspects of film theory--explaining, through
a series of focused lectures and group discussions, a selection
of key terms and concepts which any serious filmmaker or film scholar
should understand. Though terms such as "disavowal and fetishism,"
"signifier and signified," "the male gaze" and
"suture" may mean little or nothing to you at present,
by the end of the semester you should have gained some sense of
the meanings, applications and limitations these critical keywords.
The goal of this course will be neither mastery nor even fluency
in any specific theory, but instead the establishment of a basic
working knowledge of several important schools of thought--a knowledge
which will hopefully whet your appetite for future research, and
at the very least allow you some means of entry into texts and films
which would otherwise have seemed insurmountable.
Though the nucleus of this course will be a series of weekly critical
and theoretical readings, you will at the same time be presented
with a series of difficult and provocative films--works of cinematic
art which will serve as a testing ground for each week's theories.
As you will see, each screening has been deliberately chosen for
its innovation, either inside or outside the Hollywood system. Like
the texts you will be reading, these films have the ability to amaze
and intellectually satisfy a viewing audience, but also the potential
to agitate, disconcert, and stun--at times transforming the passive
act of viewing into an active confrontation.
As
we wade into this difficult semester, my best advice would be for
you to concentrate not on the numerous aspects of film theory which
you don't understand, but to determine just exactly what is it that
you do understand. Starting with this single firm foothold, I think
you'll be surprised how much you can ultimately grasp.
|